|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on October 8, 2009
|
Idle speculation...
125: Logan Stieber, frosh (Touris)
133: Nikko Triggas, Sr (Henry, Harrington)
141: Ian Paddock, Soph (Vaughn, Zamaria)
149: Collin Palmer, frosh (rdshrt) (Fee, Drake)
157: Sean Nemec, Jr (Jameson, Kusar)
165: Colt Sponseller, Sr (Garcia)
174: Demas, frosh (Pendleton)
184: Heflin rdshrt frosh (Sanders, Capone)
197: Magrum rdshrt soph (Bowers)
285: Hiles rdshrt soph
None of this takes into account the possibility of weight class shifts, or additional impact recruits. Also, I don't know the roster well enough to really say who's getting better and might break through. But it gives some sense of what life will be like post Pucillo, Hump and Jags. And Bucks will certainly be after some major recruits for 11-12. Two guys named Phillips and Campolattano will probably be high on their list. I could see Cam Tessari as another wish list guy as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Scott Nicola added to this discussion on October 8, 2009
|
It will be interesting to see how much Tessari grows in the next two years.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Dan Cosimi added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
The Buckeye lineup is looking very good for the future and I don't think they will stop at just Stieber, Demas and Garcia for this recruiting class.
A top priority will likely be bringing in a heavyweight who will be able to push Hiles for the starting spot. This isn't easy to do as many of the top-notch heavyweights also being very good football prospects. In fact, glancing at today's Plain Dealer, I saw a tuba-toting Buzzelli pictured with a little blurb about him being recruited by Division 1 schools for football.
The most ideal situation imaginable (for fans) would be Missouri's -- their starter, Mark Ellis, was the national champion and their backup, FILA Junior World Champion Dom Bradley, might have been the favorite to win the national championship if he had been in Ellis' spot.
I'm not saying the Buckeyes need a Missouri-esque situation but having Bradley in the room constantly pushing Ellis is something that will make both of them reach greater heights. If Hiles gets a training partner like that...
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Bob Preusse added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
after this season buckeye lineup doesnt look that good to me for 2010-11, not alot of proven college talent as of today. That can change and we expect & hope it changes--- but it hasnt occured yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
Bob: Everyone says that Buckeyes aren't done but who's left? Are there any guys around--both locally and nationally--that would be considered impact recruits?
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Don Bork added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
Any possibility that, in 2010-11, Paddock redshirts, Palmer goes 141 and Jameson is our 149? Those are the weights they are listed at on the current roster.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Brad Perkins added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
I didn't see Hunter Stieber mentioned in the upcoming line-up ('11-'12 recruits). Got to hope he will be in the mix as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Bob Preusse added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
come on Brad, in 2010-11 Hunter Stieber will still be in high school.
Jameson 149? nope--- here's how it looks:
Jameson 157/65
Heflin 74/84
Capone 84/97
Hank, more i don't know, but maybe Brad Squire ? his style would work well in college, plus he had a major illness setback last season, so his college stock dropped but he might prove to be a bluechipper still. s/BobP
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Brad Perkins added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
Come on Bob, I said 11 - 12 recruits.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Bob Preusse added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
oh u said 11-12, ok ---- but the title of this thread and lineup posted on here is 10-11 thus my confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Don Bork added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
There must be some reason Jameson is listed at 149. I can remember many people saying Hump would "no way" see 133 again after his true frosh year. I'd also like to see Heflin go 174 and let Demas redshirt with Garcia.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Bob Preusse added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
"There must be some reason Jameson is listed at 149"
just the usual misinformation found on websites & forums, disregard it.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Marlo Stanfield added to this discussion on October 9, 2009
|
Bob what's up with Evan Craig 285 from PA
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Bob Preusse added to this discussion on October 10, 2009
|
Evan Craig 285 from PA, don't know if hes commited to wr in college or playing football, whatever--- we are ranking him pretty high at AWN. # 1 will be Jimmy Lawson from NJ.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 10-11 Bucks Lineup
Kevin Schlosser added to this discussion on October 12, 2009
|
Tony Jameson is certifying at 149 this season, the Ohio State website is correct. He has stated in several interviews he will be trying to make the lineup at 157 this season and has the option of wrestling 149-157 next year. If healthy and he doesn't grow, I think 149 is much more likely next year than 165 if he wants to wrestle on the varsity team and isn't the guy at 157.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
